Jump to content

Dave Martin

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Dave Martin

  1. Dave Martin

    Archival Record Preservation

    Henry, I'm sure you're not alone in this! You might find it useful to reach out to bodies such as the (UK based) Museums Association https://www.museumsassociation.org/ If they cannot help directly, they might be able to advise other useful professional curatorial contacts. Dave
  2. Ken, just another thought - you're not moving or re-naming any of the files are you?
  3. Ken, Re trying a known good PTI file; I'm away from my workstation with files currently but if you haven't got this cracked by this evening I'll pop a working RTI in a dropbox folder for you tonight. Dave
  4. Ken, Re the PTM fitter, there's a replacement download link here:
  5. Ken, A few things that would help narrow this down: Have you managed to build and view RTI files before (on any of these machines)? Have you any older RTI files you can (still) open? Is it just one set of images that causes this? If you have a set of images that worked previously, can you try re-processing them and then see if you can open the RTI file? You mention it is the same on multiple computers, does that mean you've done the whole process (generate then view) on each PC? If you generate on one PC is it unreadable on all three PCs? Is it the same if you generate using the PTM fitter? Dave
  6. Dave Martin

    Unknown Error Detected

    Niki/Judith, I'm just a fellow-user, not involved with RTI software development, but I also use Windows platform. If it would help you, if you can share some images I would be glad to try them if I get a chance at the weekend. Will send you message with my contact details if you would like me to try. Dave
  7. Dave Martin

    Unknown Error Detected

    Niki/Judith, a couple of thoughts: 1) to try and find out if it is something with the images, or with, say, memory, it would be worth as Carla says trying a down-sampled set of the same images just as a test; maybe resample them down to half their size (you can use the free IrfanView to do this in batch mode). 2) also, if you have a smaller number of the big images, does it crash the same? 3) does it always stop on 000361.jpg ? 4) the folder named says ....\cropped\... - are all the images the same size after cropping? - is there any chance the offending one is a different size? 5) is it the same if you try on a different computer? Dave
  8. Dave Martin

    Processing in Multiple Locations

    Whilst I have never done trans-oceanic capture/processing, my advice would be to try and do it on site - not necessarily at the monument but whilst you are still in-country. Points which I would suggest you consider include: 1) the processing overheads are not enormous - certainly unlike the demands placed by processing SfM photogrammetry - and it is well within the capability of a reasonable modern laptop. 2) uploading to a 'cloud' location could be slow and un-reliable. 3) if you process say, same day, you can tell if all is OK; so if you discover a problem you can re-shoot and/or amend your procedures for other forthcoming sites in the same campaign. Even if you are shooting tethered where you can see results on a larger screen as you shoot, it still makes real sense to process at the earliest opportunity. As an example, if the sphere(s) get nudged part-way through a shoot, unless it is a gross movement, each frame will probably still look OK as a standalone frame, but it is only when you do the processing you may find alignment problems (I've done that and had to return to re-shoot, thankfully only 15 miles away). Processing on a good laptop might take a couple of minutes more but not hours more. Edit: another reason, similar to (3) above, is that sometimes when you process, although you didn't make a mistake shooting, when you process it, may reveal 'something', say at the edge of the field of view or just disappearing round the side of something, so you may want to pop back and re-shoot from a different camera position to try and capture more... Dave
  9. Dave Martin

    RTI Builder Versions

    Jlutgen, Re version numbers - the one I'm using is 2.0.2 Where you are seeing '3.0' are you sure that's not the software license you're seeing? as that is 'GPL 3.0' ? Dave
  10. Dave Martin

    CHI's Resources for Photogrammetry Users

    Shahin, I think the answer is "it depends"! - it depends on what you're trying to image - a small artefact or a building; it depends on what version of PhotoScan you're using (and just to confuse things, they have renamed it from PhotoScan to Metashape with the release of version 1.5); it depends on the sensor used; etc. Far and away the best place to search for help on PhotoScan is on the dedicated Agisoft forum - just search for "workflow" (almost 80 hits). One thread to which I would particularly refer you to is https://www.agisoft.com/forum/index.php?topic=9485.msg43931#msg43931 which discusses the workflow developed by Tom Noble et al of the USGS, and that of Bob Meij. (would also suggest this might be better in a thread of its own ....) Dave
  11. Dave Martin

    RTI Builder Unknown error

    Niki, If it is a resource issue due to the size of the images, one way to identify if it is absolute image size that is causing a problem, or just the total demand on the system, might be to try processing a reduced number of your hi-res images. I don't know how many you have in your full set - I have 50-100 typically - but if you maybe tried with maybe just ten images? - the RTI obviously wouldn't be as good but it might help to diagnose the problem? I'm sorry that, as just another user, I can only use my RTI and computer troubleshooting experience, I haven't any access to the innards of the programs! Dave
  12. Dave Martin

    RTI Builder Unknown error

    Nikki, another tiny thought in case it helps shed light on the problem. You might just see something if you have memory monitoring displayed when it crashes on your big images? and there might also be something written into the Windows logs? Dave
  13. Dave Martin

    RTI Builder Unknown error

    Thanks Nikki, sounds as if moving (slowly!) towards possible indicators. I'm glad it works for at least sample images so software setup looks OK. I don't know about any absolute image size limits, I just did a quick search here and found this thread which does describe processing large images 10328x7760px, albeit I think on a Mac. I'm sorry that I can't help much more at present - I'm not in front of my (PC based) RTI workstation, I think it may be a case of waiting until Carla and team at CHI are on-air (San Francisco time). mfG Dave
  14. Dave Martin

    RTI Builder Unknown error

    Also Nikki, another thought - if you download one of the sample image sets from the CHI website, which are known to work OK, do they work on this PC? Dave
  15. Dave Martin

    RTI Builder Unknown error

    Nikki, Firstly, now that error message is visible, there is a thread here on this forum about exactly that message which might give you some clues Secondly, have you tried on another PC? Dave
  16. Dave Martin

    RTI Builder Unknown error

    Nikki, path looks OK as far as I can tell. Couple of questions: 1) you mention it fails after cropping, does it fail if you don't crop? 2) you mention you're trying PTM, you have downloaded and installed the PTM Fitter, haven't you? (page 10 of the processing manual) 3) if you try HSH rather than PTM, any change? Dave
  17. Dave Martin

    RTI Builder Unknown error

    Niki - can you post a screenshot showing the file path?
  18. Dave Martin

    3D File Formats to Archive and Display

    Jack, I think this is an important question to consider, and the answer may depend on the purpose and the longevity expected. You mention Archive and Display, and I think there are useful parallels in terms of images, especially as we may have one format for long-term assured storage and another for speedier manipulation and display. You mention DNG, and DNG can contain TIFFs. Top-level archives which accept images will often specify they must be un-compressed TIFFs. This seems counter-intuitive in that they are taking on storage obligations which could be significantly reduced, but they are protecting against future licensing changes. The TIFF standard has no proprietary issues, but some of the algorithms behind compression standards, whilst open to read and implement at present, are private property, and there is the danger that permission may be revoked. Whilst not implying any concerns over or criticism of Khronos, it states at the top of https://www.khronos.org/gltf/ “glTF™ (GL Transmission Format) is a royalty-free specification” – in other words, it looks to be remaining Khronos’s property. There are precedents to be a little concerned, especially for the long-term. The Graphics Interchange Format (‘GIF’) is now thought of by most as a container for handy little images or animations etc. The GIF was developed by the Compuserve BBS team, and internally the data is losslessly compressed using LZW. LZW is proprietary, and from what I recall, there were attempts by those who owned them to assert their rights the LZW algorithm, and this led to the development of the open PNG standard. I don’t have an answer in the ‘model archiving’ space but will be interested to learn. Dave
  19. Dave Martin

    re-assembling fragments

    Hi P fried, I don't know if there is anything off-the-shelf yet, but a couple of articles on computer-vision jigsaw solving: https://www.i-programmer.info/news/181-algorithms/4380-faster-jigsaw-solving.html https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220843444_An_Innovative_Algorithm_for_Solving_Jigsaw_Puzzles_Using_Geometrical_and_Color_Features Another related area which is receiving attention is the DARPA Shredder Challenge - reconstructing documents from images of shredded strips or fragments. Let us know how you get on! cheers/Dave
  20. Dave Martin

    re-assembling fragments

    P Fried, I don't know how well it would translate to such a context, but there has been work in the computer vision field trying, and succeeding, in solving jigsaws, so there might be something there. Suspect they're geared around 2D, but might be possible to use them to produced an 'unwrapped' solution? Dave
  21. Dave Martin

    Error Dump

    Katie - have you downloaded the PTM from the Hewlett Packard research site?
  22. Dave Martin

    Masking trouble in Agisoft Photoscan

    Crystal, I'm not in front of my PhotoScan workstation, but a couple of quick thoughts: There are several options for masks, one of which is a separate mask for each image, in which case all you do is select the folder containing the masks - and the symptoms sound like possibly that's the route you're currently going down. I'm not sure if you have visited it already, but - especially as the issue isn't particularly subject-matter specific - I'm sure you would find it worthwhile to visit the dedicated PhotoScan forum operated by Agisoft themselves, where there's support from Agisoft staff and fellow users http://www.agisoft.com/forum/index.php?board=7.0 Also, on the Agisoft forum there is info on new masking methods (single image, volumetric...) which have been introduced in recent versions of PhotoScan. Dave
  23. DLN:CC Beta – software version 1.0.3 (build 26 Apr 2018 15:55:31) / DB version 2.2.3 First few observations / comments: Needs Regionalisation, in particular dates – looking at examples logged today (4 June 2018) it looks like 6 April 2018 (6-4-2018). If the system can’t/won’t reference the users’ locale, or maybe even as a ‘better’ fix, suggest that the date format, when displayed at least, is dd-mmm-yyyy so it shows 7-Feb-2018 etc which is then un-ambiguous world-wide. Registering an RTI image set has various string (Egyptian, not computer!)-related prompts. Might I suggest there’s a tick-box/radio-button or similar to indicate string or dome? Talking of domes, I can see how one would create an entry for a dome in the equipment register. Domes are rarely off-the-shelf and thinking of how one could/would document a dome, I wonder if the ability to associate photographs with project setups could usefully be extended to allow one or more photos of a piece of equipment (e.g. a dome type rig) to be associated with that equipment entry to save having to re-associate them with every group or set of images acquired using the same rig. In documenting an Image Set, it allows Operators to be associated, and to specify their role. However, it only allows one role per operator. In real life there may well be multiple roles for an actor/operator (e.g. image acquisition, computer processing). Could ‘fudge’ this by creating hybrid roles (e.g. 'photographer / computer operator'), or having schizophrenic clones of the same operator (‘Dave Martin – photographer’, ‘Dave Martin – computer operator’) but that is de-normalised and doesn’t reflect reality; so multiple roles are needed. Dave
  24. Thanks Carla, yes understand can create a grouping for the dome, and apologies if I didn't make question clear. The point was that the dome structure is (relatively) invariant, so rather than have to associate pictures of the dome or rig with every image set taken with the dome, the 'normalised' solution would be to associate the pictures with the equipment. Similar might apply to, say, a photogrammetry turntable arrangement which was used repeatedly. Dave
  25. Thanks Erich, Have just tried that and, exactly as you say, ticking '[ ] Show associated?' does allow an operator to be added with another role. I would observe/suggest: 1) Not sure if it might be better either completely without the need to tick that box, or reverse the default / pre-tick the box. It certainly isn't obvious (until you know how!) 2) As you say, once that box is ticked, not only can you associate multiple roles, but you can add several instances of the same actor/operator with exactly the same role. Would strongly suggest that is not a valid result, so basic validation when associating an operator with an image set would be to present only those roles which they don't have already - so adding a completely new operator would in effect offer all roles; adding an operator for a second or subsequent time would offer a reduced set of roles (NOT IN ...) Dave